SQUIRES-SANDERS, INC. SS-1R/701 RECEIVER -
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS - SS-1R/701
The SS-1R (701) receiver was praised by many and criticized by others.
Over the years there has been a lot of talk about this receiver but maybe not always
things have been said and described as really are. In this article it has been tried to
clarify some aspects by highlighting its merits and also its flaws.
LIGHTS and SHADOWS
on the
SQUIRES-SANDERS,
INC. SS-1R/701 Series Receiver
by Vincent Italia
1-INTRODUCTION
2-AESTHETICAL and MECHANICAL DESIGN
3-DESIGN PHILOSOPHY and ELECTRICAL DESIGN
-
FRONT END
-
SECOND CONVERSION and FIXED IF
-
AGC CIRCUITS, DETECTORS, BFO and AF
-
POWER SUPPLY and AM-SSB-CW SWITCHING LOGIC
-
EXTERNAL CONNECTIONS
4-CONCLUSION
5-NOTES
6-REFERENCES
7-THE SHADOWS
-
INQUIRY and ANALYSIS
-
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
The
design of the SS-1R receiver was born, in the early sixties, from the fertile
and brilliant mind of William K. Squires vice president and cofounder of the
homonymous firm Squires-Sanders, Incorporated. The SS-1R marked an important
step
because it was the first HF receiver
where they were used mixers with a balanced configuration when up until
then other designers (with blinders!) persisted in using the usual
pentagrid tube or at most triodes but always in single-ended configurations. The
advantages in using balanced mixers
were well known since the twenties!
Another record to be attributed to Squires is that he used a
beam deflection tube (1),
type 7360 (2),
as a switching balanced mixer and without an RF amplifier stage (Ref.3).
Nobody dared so much before if we exclude the 1961 Mosley CM-1 receiver that was
exempt from an RF amplifier. The 7360 tube was chosen by Squires not only for
its innate balanced properties but also to exploit its low noise and low
distortion characteristics. The use of this tube as a mixer with no preceding RF
amplifier stage, combined with circuits of very refined design, brought the
performance of this receiver to levels never reached before. Here below I will
try to describe the latest version of the receiver, the SS-1R/701 Series, which
includes all the modifications implemented to improve it. Most of these
modifications will be described within this document. I will also perform a
reverse engineering, where possible, by analyzing the receiver from the
standpoint of the electrical, mechanical and aesthetical design. In doing this I
will highlight its qualities, innovations and, why not,
some
défaillances.
2-AESTHETICAL and MECHANICAL DESIGN
The
SS-1R receiver was introduced in 1963 and the first thing that hit was its
elegant and out of the ordinary line. In the aesthetical design everything was
guessed (especially in the
later version than
that released in November 1963), starting from
the unusual cabinet, to the backlit S Meter, to the black slide rule tuning
dial and the rotating white drum with red and black frequency markers, to the
various knobs with aluminum trim and finally to the two black buttons with
chrome bezel, all this gave to the receiver that special look. The escutcheon
shaped logo* with
a green background and the two white interlaced S, which are the initials of the
two company founders Squires and Sanders, gave it a touch of class (Fig.1). The
three white dots above the first S and below the second S show this letter in
Morse code.
In the U.S. there was in the habit of comparing the
amateur radio equipment of a certain class to important cars, for example
Collins receivers were compared to the Cadillac; someone compared
the Squires-Sanders SS-1R to the Rolls-Royce!
The SS-1R/701 is an apparatus
that is fairly small in size; about 41.30 cm. x 19.70 cm. x 33 cm. and not
very heavy, less than 12 kilograms. The
U shaped cabinet that, from one side to the other
including the front, wraps around the chassis of the receiver, is made from a
very robust extruded aluminum profile and is externally sandblasted which gives
to it a light grey color (Fig.2a
and
Fig.2b). Two frontal prominent strips
with mirror finish, one in the upper side and the other in the lower side of the
U shaped cabinet and part of the extruded, are all along
the profile. The lower and the rear panels are a single
L piece where the upper one is hinged; together they
form a single
U
element (Fig.3a
and
Fig.3b). The
top panel being hinged can be lifted to provide access to the components
installed on the chassis. These panels are made of dark grey painted perforated
aluminum sheets. Other equipment, which I remember, with the casings of
similar
U shape are those from General Radio test instruments of
the fifties and sixties. The chassis that supports the various components is
made of gold color anodized 21/2 mm. thick aluminum. The most cumbersome part,
installed in the chassis, is the VLO with the tuning dial assembly (Fig.4a
and
Fig.4b). The dial was modified, in one of
the various evolutions of the receiver, to make it more simple, robust and
reliable. To take out the chassis, after removing; the
U element (4 screws), the knobs, the two screws securing
the chassis itself, the two S Meter wires and unplug the two under chassis
connectors (the older version of the receiver had 2 terminal strips with
soldered wires instead of the connectors -
Fig.5 and
Fig.6), just slide it in the two inner side
rails that are part of the profile.
Even without sliding the chassis all the parts and
components, that are in the top and in the bottom, are easily accessible (just
by removing the
U element) thanks to
this system of "boxing", which is simple, robust, functional and elegant, you
could say that it was an innovation.
* The Trademark and
Logo were filed on June 6, 1963 and registered on April 14, 1964 (N° 768,129)
3-DESIGN PHILOSOPHY and ELECTRICAL DESIGN
(With reference to the
block diagram and to the
electrical diagram)
See Figures
A,
B and
C
As can be seen, in the block diagram, the SS-1R/701
is apparently a normal single/double conversion receiver à la Collins, where 12 tubes are used of which 4 are Noval type and 8 are Miniature
type.
Born as a receiver for the amateur bands but really can
cover almost the entire short-wave band (see Technical Specifications and
Tabulation of XLO crystals), from 3.5 MHz to 30 MHz (5.5--7MHz excluded), by adding or replacing crystals (3).
The variable
first intermediate frequency, which covers from 5000kHz to 5500kHz (this band of
frequencies can be received by setting a switch inside of the receiver -
Fig.7), heterodyne, in the 2nd balanced mixer, with the signal
generated by the variable local oscillator (VLO), which extends from 6000kHz to
6500kHz, and generates a fixed second IF of 1000kHz where selectivity and gain
are concentrated. The variable IF is employed to receive almost all the amateur
bands plus two auxiliary General bands GA and GB (excluding the 40M band and the
two fixed frequencies of 10MHz and 15MHz) with the aid of a converter that uses
a quartz crystal controlled local oscillator (XLO) and the 1st balanced mixer.
Therefore each band has an extension of 500kHz.
The XLO is equipped with 7 crystals of which two are
used to cover the following bands: 80M, 20M, 15M, and the two fixed frequencies
of 10MHz (WWV10) and 15MHz (WWV15), only two crystals are needed to receive all
these frequencies! The other four crystals cover the 10M band in four portions
of 500kHz each (in the older version the receiver was equipped with one xtal,
the others three were optional).
The seventh crystal, of 2 MHz, is used only in the 40M band when the two (or
one of them) optional accessories, the Video Bandscanner SS-1V and the Noise
Silencer SS-1S, are connected (4).The
crystals for the two auxiliary bands GA and GB are optional. The reception of
the 40M band, which in this receiver extends from 7000kHz to 7500kHz, is simply
done by replacing the fixed 5--5.5MHz Input filter of the 2nd balanced mixer
with a 7--7.5MHz tunable filter. To receive the fixed frequencies of 10MHz and
15MHz the 1st mixer is employed with the crystal local oscillator and the 1MHz
IF. A single conversion is adopted for the 40M band, for the two fixed
frequencies (10MHz and 15MHz) and for the 5--5.5MHz band, as is evident from the
description and from the block diagram.
Why the IFs and the local oscillators frequencies have
been chosen with numbers so "round" and unusual?
The variable
first IF, starting from 5000kHz, it’s also employed to receive the WWV5, the
5MHz frequency standard station, giving the opportunity to align the VLO (with
C117 - HIGH FREQ) and thus automatically calibrate also the 40M band. The
reception of WWV10 and WWV15, two other standard frequencies stations, is
performed by using two crystals, 9MHz and 8MHz (the 2nd harmonic, 16MHz, is
used), of the first local oscillator that beating, respectively, with 10MHz and
15MHz give a 1MHz IF. Then it is easy to calibrate the two quartz crystals
frequencies (with the trimmer capacitors) by zero beating them with the two
standard stations.
Since the two crystals are also exploited to receive the 80M, the 20M and
the 15M, these three bands are automatically calibrated. All this is feasible
without the use of an internal crystal calibrator or an external device,
ingenious!
Another feature of this
receiver is that the receive frequency, in hundreds of kHz, is displayed on a
rotating drum (rotation driven by a 12 positions band switch) with a slide rule
dial driven by the tuning knob, while the tens of kHz are displayed in two
mechanical digital counters, with small sliding windows, that are located to the
right and to the left in the black tuning dial front (Fig.8).
In the 80M band and in the auxiliary GA band, where the tuning is reversed, the
small window of the left counter opens automatically while the window of the
right one, which is for the other bands, close. Thus the reading of the
frequency is direct and does not create confusion. The accuracy of the display
is given at +/- 1kHz maximum error, but in reality it is no more than
+/- 400Hz (Ref.8).
One revolution of the main tuning knob explores 10kHz, the latter has the
perfect touch feeling to tune the stations, particularly those in SSB.
Antenna signals
pass through a three sections low pass filter (FL1) with a cutoff at 30MHz and
from there sent to a series of switchable tunable filters (Fig.9) except for the
reception of the 5--5.5MHz band that uses a part of the first variable IF 500kHz
wide band pass filter centered at 5250kHz (T1/T2). In this filter a low
impedance output is also provided (link coupled to T2), J3-OUT 5MC, for
the SS-1V and the SS-1S.
The tunable input filter is a "simple" but
ingenious series LC circuit with resonance (notch) to the image frequency
whose reactance at the desired signal resonates in parallel with the variable
capacitor C12-ANT TRIMMER. This reactance is inductive when the LO
frequency is below the signal, as for almost all the amateur bands and WWV10, it
is capacitive when the LO frequency is above the signal, as for the 80M and
WWV15. In this latter case the reactance is still resonated by C12 but with
shunt inductance added. This circuit allows obtaining a very good image
frequency rejection, not less than 60dB and more than 90dB in some bands (5).
These values of rejection are only obtained when a nominal source (antenna)
impedance of 52 Ohms is presented at its input (see para.7). Be noted that other
receivers to get close to the same rejection have at least two tuned circuits or
even three (possibly with a RF amplifier intercalated amid them) between the
antenna input and the mixer! Those with the "up conversion" (IF higher than the
maximum receive frequency) are, of course, excluded. The inductors used are the
high Q Barker & Williamson Miniductors that give, in this circuit, a RF voltage
step-up of about 6 times. Only four rejection adjustments are necessary to
cover all the amateur bands, the 10MHz and the 15MHz fixed frequencies; the same
rejection coils are used on several bands. The image rejection on the GA and GB
bands is lower because it was optimized only for the amateur bands and for the
fixed frequencies. The output of the variable filter is capacitive coupled to
the grid of the first beam deflection tube, type 7360 (V1), single balanced
switching mixer. A potentiometer, R18-1st MIX BAL, part of a resistive
voltage divider, determines the voltages to the deflection electrodes of V1 for
DC current balancing. The signal of the crystal local oscillator XLO (Fig.10), which employs a 6BH6 (V3) pentode tube,
is sent through T6, a broadband balanced transformer (B & W coils -
Fig.11), to the deflection electrodes of the
7360, 180° out of phase in order to reduce antenna oscillator irradiation and
harmonic mixing. A crystal local oscillator low impedance output (link coupled
to T6), J6 XLO OUT, has been provided to be used for calibration and for
transceiving purposes (output: circa 200mV-Ref.8). The balanced IF signal is
taken from the two plates of the 7360 and sent to the T1 transformer. A possible
signal in antenna with a frequency same as the variable IF would undergo a
strong attenuation in the output of the mixer (T1 secondary) thanks, also,
to the balancing action of the atypical primary center tapped T1 IF transformer
(T1 with T3 for the 10MHz and 15MHz fixed frequencies). The local oscillator signal would be strongly present
in the output if it was not attenuated by the intermediate frequency (5--5.5MHz)
filter T1+T2 selectivity. It is interesting to note the unusual coupling between T1 and T2 that is
via two series resonant circuits, one in the first transformer secondary and the
other in the second transformer primary, connected together with coaxial cable,
being T1 located on the chassis
more than 10cm. from T2! The secondary of T2 is parallel tuned by two
capacitors in series, C55 and C58, their point of intersection is connected to
the control grid of the second mixer V2. These capacitors act also as a divider
so that the signal arrives attenuated (a bit less than 10dB) to the grid of V2.
The output of V2 is also attenuated (a
little more than 10dB) in the step-down of the T4 transformer, in practice the
V2 mixer gain (20dB) is nullified (only when in double conversion) in order to
maintain the same signal level at the input of the 1MHz IF chain, in both single
and double conversion. This suggests that some other objectives of the design
were to have the minimum indispensable gain, sufficient to not degrade the
overall noise figure, to the input of the second mixer (when in double
conversion) and the IF selectivity "closest" to the antenna. It is to underline
with how much attention the gain has been distributed in the receiver. Several
capacitive attenuators are in the signal path in order to avoid the overload of
some stages and making them work in their linear region. It is a succession of
amplification, attenuation and amplification of the signal up to the detection!
This starts with the step-up (x6) in the RF filter, the gain of V1 which is 20
dB (from the grid into the T1 5--5.5MHz transformer), the 10dB attenuation of
the capacitive divider C55/C58 and so on. Special attention was also paid to the
choice of ground connections, especially in the low level RF stages, to avoid
“ground loops” so to maintain a low internally generated noise. This aspect has
been highlighted and very well explained in
Ref.5. Singular is also the combination of T3
with T1; in the WWV10MHz and WWV15MHz positions a couple of contacts of the
S1C-R (BAND) switch open the junction of two inductors of equal value,
which make up the primary of T1, in such a way that the T3 center tapped primary
can be connected in series to T1. Thus the total inductance is the right one to
resonate at 1MHz and the balance remains unchanged.
The
SS-1R receiver underwent various
modifications (9-10),
while still in production, to improve its performances (although already very
good), these modifications were applied in several phases. One of the major
improvements regards the sensitivity that was increased by a minimum of 3dB to a
maximum of 6dB, this has been done, probably, by modifying the RF input filter
and by changing some values of its components. This assumption derived from the
comparison of the
SS-1R front end electrical schematic with that
of the SS-1R/701 (Ref.1
and
2). I believe that a better matching to a 52 Ohms source has been
realized by this modification. In the receiver Field Alignment Procedure (Ref.6)
it is stressed that the sensitivity had to be better than 0.3µV (0.25µV
typical!) at 10dB S + N / N, CW mode with a 2.5 kHz IF bandwidth, in the 20, 15,
and 10M bands. Not bad for a receiver without an RF amplifier stage! (12)
Another modification was to replace the ceramic trimmer capacitors, in all
critical circuits, with precision glass and ceramic piston capacitors, to
enhance frequency stability and performance.
SECOND CONVERSION and FIXED IF
In the second
conversion we find another 7360 (V2) as a single balanced switching mixer and
thus has the same principle of operation of the first mixer. Here also a
potentiometer, R24-2nd MIX BAL, is used to adjust the DC voltages balance
to the deflection electrodes where the signal from the VLO, 6000kHz to 6500kHz,
is sent in push-pull through T5. In the Test Procedure manual (Ref.8)
it is specified that the VLO RF voltage in each deflector must be 1.5 Volts RMS +/-0.25 Volt, though a 3 Volts RMS per electrode was suggested by
Squires in Ref. 3. Higher voltages would lead to a better sensitivity and lower
distortion (Ref.9)
but they have been kept low to avoid harmonic mixing and the occurrence of
spurious responses, this consideration is also valid for the first mixer V1. A
better explanation of this aspect is available in the last chapter of this
document. The connection between the VLO output (J14) and the second mixer VLO
input (J4) is via a connectorized coaxial cable (on the chassis VLO OUT
and VLO IN), this cable (W3) must be removed when connecting the
Video Bandscanner SS-1V. The 1MHz component at the output of V2, resulting from
the beat, is filtered and balanced by the T4 transformer. Similarly the link between T4 output (J5)
and the fixed 1MHz intermediate frequency amplifier input (J8) is by a
connectorized coaxial cable (W2). By removing this link (on the chassis 1MC
OUT and 1MC IN), the SS-1S Noise Silencer can be inserted. The
variable local oscillator VLO is equipped with a double triode type 6BK7B (V11),
a triode as a temperature compensated Hartley oscillator and the other as a
cathode follower. The coupling to the input of the cathode follower is via a
capacitive divider (for a lighter coupling) and its cathode output is filtered
by a low pass filter. The LC combination of the oscillator gives a very linear
frequency excursion. The inductor (L16) of the resonant circuit is made of
preheated copper wire wrapped on a large threaded ceramic form with a
cylindrical shield; the whole is mounted on a thick aluminum plate. The high quality precision variable capacitor (C115) of
the VLO is driven by a worm and its spring-loaded gears and has a clutch system
to disengage an electric AC motor (Fig.12).
This motor is used to go from one end to
the other of the band, in a few seconds, by pressing one of the two round
buttons that are at the bottom of the tuning dial. Pushing both buttons
simultaneously will not energize the motor in order to avoid its damage. The
motorized tuning (6)
is alternative to that manual and is much appreciated because, for exploring
manually the 500kHz band in use, you must turn the tuning knob as many as 50
times! This feature can also be useful to scan the band. No electrical noise can
be heard when the motor is energized. The power supply of the whole receiver is
without any stabilization, this is to prevent electronic noise which is usually
generated by the VR tubes and Zener diodes. This indicates, once again, a
maniacal care in maintaining a low internal noise. The VLO, even though no power
supply regulation is employed has an excellent stability, less than
100Hz frequency change after 5 minutes from the warm-up with +/-10% line voltage variation. How can
be that this variable oscillator is so stable without any voltage regulation and
no thermostatic stabilization? The trick seems to be in the feedback which is
lesser than usual and in a lower output coupling (Ref.5), another
inedited circuit from this exceptional receiver. In the 5kHz position, of the
S4-SELECTIVITY switch, the selectivity is given by the intermediate
frequency transformers T4, T8, T9 and T10. One might think that these
transformers are the usual slug-tuned adjustable instead they are made of
ferrite pot cores (except T10), this allows to achieve a very high Q (400 to
500). It would have been impossible to get such a high Q, at a frequency of
1MHz, with normal IF transformers. The very loose coupling between an inductor
and the other, of the single transformer, is capacitive; a 0.75 pF (!) capacitor
for T8 and 1pF capacitor for T9. Both of the transformers primaries are tapped
down so as not to be "loaded” by the tube which precedes it and thus maintain a
high Q, consequently the selectivity is at its maximum. These peculiarities
ensure that the “noise bandwidth” of the entire IF amplifier remains narrow
in the three selectivity positions. Another aspect that emerges
from the electrical diagram is that the coupling
between some stages (as those of the IF) is the most light possible (almost to
not “disturb” them!) not only to avoid overload of the stage that follows, as
mentioned in the previous chapter, but also to exploit at maximum the
selectivity of the circuits used.
The SSB selectivity is obtained by a low insertion loss (1 to 2 dB) quartz
crystals filter of multiple sections (FL2) with a 2.5 kHz bandwidth and a 1:2
form factor. In the 350Hz position a two crystals filter (FL3) is connected in
series to the 2.5 kHz filter to take advantage of its excellent out of band
rejection. The selectivity control is separated from that of the receive mode.
The first two 1 MHz intermediate frequency amplifier stages employ two 6BA6
pentodes (V4 and V5) which are controlled by the AGC. The cathode resistors of
these two tubes are of low value, 68 ohms, and without any by-pass capacitors to
increase their linearity and stability. The V4 and V5 tubes plate current feed
(through a resistive bridge circuit) the S Meter milliammeter (1mA f.s.) which
reads accurately (in S units and dB referred to 1uV) the signal level,
regardless of the
RF GAIN (R59) setting, as long as the signal is moving the meter.
Potentiometer R33 is for the METER ZERO adjustment and R35 for the
METER MAX
setting. The third IF
amplifier uses the pentode section (V7A) of a double tube type 6AX8 which
amplifies the IF signal without being controlled by the AGC. The IF signal is
picked up from a capacitive divider on the T9 secondary and sent to its control
grid. The potentiometer R106-CAL, in the V7A cathode, determines the
total gain of the receiver and it is used
to set a S9 reading in the
S Meter with a 50µV, 21.25MHz, signal at the
antenna input. Following is V6, a 6AL5 dual diode type tube, which
acts as an automatic noise limiter; the threshold can be manually adjusted by
a potentiometer R83-LIMITER.
This ANL operates in the IF (unlike audio limiters) on all modes, AM, SSB or CW.
A switch is coupled to R83 that can exclude the ANL.
AGC CIRCUITS, DETECTORS, BFO and AF
After the last IF
transformer (T10) we have a 6AV6 (V8) which replaced the 6AL5 of the older
version of the SS-1R. The 6AV6 is used in an unusual combined circuit for
the development of the AGC and the isolation of its circuitry. The triode
section acts as a cathode follower to isolate the two diodes unit, that are used
as AGC rectifiers, from the IF amplifier (to avoid pulling of the BFO) and from
the AM diode detector (CR4) type 1N34A. This diode is operated at high-level
(above 2 Volts) for low distortion. The twin diode contained within the 6AV6
tube have the following functions; the first one rectify the IF signal and hence
generates the AGC negative voltage to control, with fast attack and slow
release, the gain of the two V4 and V5 intermediate frequency amplifiers (first
loop), the second diode generates another negative voltage to control the gain
of the first mixer V1 in case that very strong signals are present in antenna
(second loop). In the old version of the receiver also the V2 mixer was
controlled by the second loop AGC. The second V8 diode is also used to clips
noise peaks and prevents them to produces "bursts" in the AGC. Another 1N34A
(CR10) allows to apply the second negative voltage to the first mixer from a
predetermined bias level and hence with a delay from the first AGC intervention.
This results in a very efficient double loop automatic gain control system. The
selection of the time constants is by the AGC
SLOW-FAST-OFF
S5 switch, which are for the Attack 0,001second and for the Release; 1,0 second
for SLOW and 0,1 second for FAST. The OFF position is
normally used for special tests or for alignment purposes. The SSB product
detector (V9), which in the earlier version of the receiver was a 6BE6, employs
a 6BY6 (dual-control heptode that was used mainly in television sets) in a
sophisticated circuit designed to achieve extremely linear detection. The BFO
frequency is sent to the first grid and the IF signal, taken from the capacitive
divider in T10 primary, feeds the grid N°3. This divider is exploited too as a
low impedance IN/OUT connection (TP2). Looking at the schematic we can note,
among other, a negative feedback path from the output to the input (grid N°3) of
V9 and a particular bias arrangement, presumably, for a better linearization of
the detection and for a lower spurious responses output content. The combination
of this detector circuit with the automatic gain control and, of course, with
the two 7360s give a dynamic range of 1µV--1V! (7)
The BFO with the 6AU6 pentode
(V12) is very stable thanks to a carefully designed oscillator, this stability
has been further improved, in the newer version of the receiver, by the addition
of two crystals (Y10 and Y11), one for LSB and another one for USB, keeping the
variable oscillator (+/ - 4kHz) for
CW. For the audio amplifier we have the triode section of the 6AX8 (V7B) as a
preamplifier driving a fixed biased 6AS5 beam tube which provides a maximum
power output of 2 Watts on a load of 4 or 500 Ohms. The SS-1RS matching cabinet
houses a loudspeaker with a 4 Ohms impedance voice coil. The cabinet
neatly houses also the SS-1S Noise Silencer when available.
POWER SUPPLY and AM-SSB-CW SWITCHING LOGIC
The
power supply transformer has a primary for 105 to 125 Volts 50/60Hz (on request
a 220 Volts version was available) and two secondaries; one has a center tapped
high voltage winding and the other has a 6.3 Volts winding for the tube
filaments. The two high voltage half-wave of the secondary are rectified by two
silicon diodes and the resultant voltage is filtered by a Greek PI circuit with
choke. The DC output voltage is +140 Volts and is used for the B supply. From
one branch of the H.V. secondary two negative DC voltages are derived in a
rectifier circuit with a silicon diode. The two negative voltages are -45V and
-75V and are used for; the audio tube bias, the RF GAIN, the LSB and USB
switching logic, the Muting and for the Noise Silencer. A potentiometer R84,
with front panel control (NOISE SILENCER), is used to adjust the negative
voltage, derived from the -75V rail, to the circuit of the SS-1S Noise Silencer
when it is connected to the receiver. As already mentioned no stabilizers are
used
so as to help maintain a low internal noise in the
receiver. To reduce the internal (and external)
stray magnetic fields effects, mainly due to the transformers, in the two mixers
and therefore their unbalance, both 7360s are fitted with mu-metal
shields.
The switching logic required to
provide the right frequencies from the VLO and the BFO, when switching between
AM, SSB and CW, and thus maintaining the correct reading frequency, is rather
complex, this is due to the choice of the IFs and crystals frequencies that
allow WWV auto calibration of the bands.
Germanium diodes (1N34A) are employed as
switches to shift the VLO and BFO frequencies for proper LSB or USB operation.
The logic involves the S7-AM-LSB-USB-CW switch
and the S1 BAND switch. The switching is of DC voltages only.
EXTERNAL CONNECTIONS
Another special
feature of this receiver is the multitude of coaxial connectors (Fig.13),
for external
connections, which is provided. In addition to the BNC antenna input connector
(J1) it has the following
RCA/Cinch jacks (female):
(with reference to the electrical diagram)
- J3 Output (and Input) 1st IF,
5—5,5MHz (T2)
- J4 Input to the
2nd Mixer for the VLO (T5)
- J5 Output 1MHz
IF from 2nd Mixer (T3)
- J6 Output (or
Input LO 1st mixer) XLO (T6)
- J8 Input 1MHz
IF amplifier chain (T7)
- J9 Output AF
from detectors
- J10 Output AF 500 Ohms
(T11)
- J11 Mute
- J12 Loudspeaker 4 Ohms
(T11)
- J13 Phones (T11)
- J14 Output VLO
- TP1 In/Out low impedance (cathode) 1st Mixer
- TP2 Output 1 MHz IF amplifier (V7A) and
Input last IF
transformer (T10)
and :
- J7 11 pins socket for
accessories (SS-1S, SS-1T, VHF converter, etc.)
2 extra AC outlets
for the accessories.
Some of these
connections are for a normal use, see Speaker, Mute, etc. Connectors have also
been provided for the connection of accessories such as the SS-1S, the SS-1V,
for the SS-1T transmitter, which, unfortunately, was never marketed (Ref.7)
and for a phantomatic VHF converter of which little or nothing is known. These and the others interfacing connectors lend
themselves to testing purposes and to facilitate the alignment, but probably
they were also provided to make tests at different stages of the receiver and
possibly modify them to improve their performance. A note of disapproval regards
the use (for some of the connections) of a coaxial connector type that is more
suitable for AF than for RF (excluding, of course, the BNC Antenna connector). This also makes
the interface with RF test instruments more complicated. This receiver, that had a sale price rather high
(justifiable for everything else), would deserved something better, although this type of connector has been
used in many radio amateur equipment from other brands.
4-CONCLUSION
Despite more than
forty-six years have elapsed since its birth, the
SS-1R/701 holds very well the
comparison with recent receivers. Although one might argue that its SSB
selectivity is not the best, the frequency stability, albeit very good, is not
that of a synthesized receiver, but when you listen to it you notice that it’s
truly unique in that the weak signals coming from the antenna, which in other
receivers are audible but not very understandable, in the SS-1R/701 they are
perfectly decipherable although if strong in band signals are present. The two
7360s, performing an excellent job, combined with low phase noise local
oscillators, a very effective AGC and a correct gain distribution, contribute
largely in giving to this receiver a very low internal noise and offer a
"relaxing" reception. All this is thanks to a careful and ingenious design,
nothing has been left to chance! Unfortunately this receiver has not had the
commercial success it deserved maybe because its selling price was rather high
(in 1963 the cost of this receiver was one and a half times that of the Collins
75S3) or maybe because of the strict characteristics requirements of the antenna
to be used (see chapter 7). We must remember that many (but not all!)
contemporary receivers were “panting machines” with an amplification of “a lot
of dB” and that was enough to connect a piece of wire as an antenna to listen to
“everything”, even what was not to be in the actual band in use! For the technical solutions adopted and for the
refinement of the circuits used, in my opinion, the SS-1R/701 can
be placed at the apex of the radio amateur HF receivers with tube technology.
This supremacy was maintained even (more than ever!) with the advent of
receivers with solid state technology and lasted until the arrival of those of
recent generations.
I believe that this
receiver was simply ahead of its time.
One of the
receiver's slogans, “in a class by
itself “, was really guessed!
5-NOTES
1 - Before Squires there have been other designers who had the idea of
using a beam deflection tube as a RF mixer for receivers. There are also patents
from the 40s and 50s for mixers and converters with this type of tubes. There is even a patent of the thirties (!) where it is
suggested to use a “cathode ray” tube type as a super heterodyne mixer and as a
CW detector. Nevertheless no merit is denied to Squires because in reality he
was the first to have used a beam deflection tube as a HF receiver switching
mixer in an original and functional circuit, to have described its operation and
to have highlighted its unique properties with respect to the intermodulation
and low noise, what his predecessors have not done.
On August 23, 1963 Squires applied for a patent with application serial No.
304,006.
2 - The 7360 beam deflection tube was developed for applications in
balanced modulators, balanced frequency mixers and converters more specifically
for SSB and DSB transmitters up to, at least, 100MHz, so as to achieve a high
degree of suppression of the carrier. It was William K. Squires who used it as a
HF receiver mixer, with the results that we know, though, almost
contemporaneously, a certain Mr. Guy Herbert Smith, Jr. proposed it, in a
thesis, as a low distortion mixer for receiver. However he injected the local
oscillator signal in the first grid and the antenna signal to the deflection
plates. As far as it is known Squires has not developed further the 7360 mixer
instead he used a double triode tube, 6DJ8 type, in an unusual and very
interesting balanced switching circuit (Ref.10).
After that he designed a low noise switching mixer, with two FETs, similar to
that with the 6DJ8 tube (Ref.11).
Evidence suggests that Squires-Sanders utilized these two mixers; one in a
military HF receiver, AN/URR-58, and the other in a marine receiver for the U.S.
Coast Guard. This marine receiver could "... accept signals up to 7 Volts RMS
with no notable distortion." Rumors indicate that only three AN/URR-58 were
built and that this military receiver had a vague resemblance to the Collins
R-390(A)/URR. I have no way to confirm or to invalidate this (for now) then it
remain only the "rumors".
NEW (March 2011) -
See note 13.
3 - Custom factory modifications were
available if the SS-1R was to be used consistently for frequencies other than
the amateur bands. This customizing could include performance optimizing
(particularly image rejection) and special dial scales for a variety of
bandswitch-frequency arrangements. Receivers with such customizing could be
obtained only on special factory order.
4 - For the operation of the SS-1V and/or the SS-1S a wideband IF
output of 5--5.5MHz is needed from the receiver and since a single conversion is
adopted for the reception of the 40M band (with V2 mixer) this wideband IF is
created by using the first mixer V1 and the 2MHz xtal in the XLO. The 40M
signals coming out from the RF filter are splitted in two outputs; one goes to
the V2 mixer that gives an IF of 1MHz for a normal reception use, the other goes
to the V1 mixer that generates a wideband IF of 5--5.5MHz only for the operation
of the SS-1V and SS-1S.
5 - A filter with a similar working principle was employed in tube
television sets of the fifties.
It was used to bypass to ground the audio carrier frequency in the video IF
amplifier.
It must be know that W.K. Squires worked, among other, for the Sylvania Electric
Products -
Radio and Television Division and several patents covering the television field
were released to him.
6 - Some receivers with a motorized tuning:
- Zenith Model 12S265 (1938)
- Phonola Model 567 (1940)
- Telefunken E52 Köln (1942)
- Hallicrafters R45/ARR7 Receiver (1944)
- Scott Radio Laboratories Inc. Model 800 B-6 (1947)
- Collins R-389/URR (1951)
- Saba Mod. Freiburg - Automatic 100 Stereo (1959)
- Philips 8RO 5/501 (1963)
- JRC NRD-11E (1968)
7 - In the SS-1R Test Procedure (Ref.8) for the Overload Test it is
specified that no overload, and so no audio distortion, should occurs up to a 3
Volts (!) signal at the antenna input (without SS-1S inserted).
8 - An antenna tuner, the Broadband Antenna Matcher, was then
produced by Squires-Sanders as an external add-on for the SS-1R and the
SS-IBS
(11) receivers to remedy to the impedance matching problem between the antenna
and receiver.
9 - A retrofit 1 MHz IF T-Notch filter was later available for the
SS-1R and
SS-IBS, it
was a passive but very effective circuit. A high Q ferrite pot core was used for
the inductor of the tunable rejection circuit.
10 - Several modifications were made to the SS-1R receiver, during
its production life cycle, to improve its performances and to get the best from
each circuit. These modifications were implemented in different times and in
almost two years (November ‘63/September ’65), so various versions of the
receiver have been sold. The version that incorporates all the improvements is
the 701 Series SS-1R (the previous version was the 700 Series). After that
Squires-Sanders produced (1967?) an IF T-Notch filter board to be factory
retrofitted, so we may find, per example, a 1964 version of the receiver with
this filter installed. It could be that towards the end of its production life
the receiver has been manufactured with the built-in Notch filter, but this is
not sure. Nowadays it is not easy to come across a SS-1R with this filter. From
the indications and information in my possession I can deduce that the receivers
of the older versions could be updated and retrofitted, with some of the
modifications/improvements, by the manufacturer. It also seems that the SS-1R
receivers of the 701 Series, with higher serial numbers, have an identification
paper sticker with a green background instead of the black and silver riveted
photo-etched aluminum plate.
11 - The
SS-IBS receiver is basically an
SS-1R/701 but for the International Broadcast
Shortwave bands reception. It does not have the CW 500Hz quartz crystals filter
that was replaced by an LC one with 8kHz bandwidth. Listening to this receiver
in the AM mode is an unforgettable experience; if the received AM broadcast
station is of good quality and the signal has an adequate level then just switch
from the 5kHz to the 8kHz bandwidth to have "High Fidelity" on the shortwave!
The SS-IBS
makes "blush of shame" many other renowned and "noble" AM receivers! This
receiver was used by the VOA as a monitor and probably as a relay receiver.
12 - Is it correct saying that the SS-1R
(or the SS-IBS) is a receiver without an RF amplifier? Not really. We must
considering the 7360 mixer as a "double" tube or as a two stages circuit that
is; a good RF pentode amplifier followed by a very good switching mixer. An
excellent combination in a single 9 pin bulb! All this was clearly stated by
Squires in his article (Ref.3).
13
- From recent information (March 2011)
:
the "Military" receiver and the "Marine" receiver are the same! The AN/URR-58
was developed specifically for the U.S. Coast Guard. Its resemblance to the Collins R-390(A)/URR is very very vague (almost
inexistent), the only similar part is the mechanical digital readout.
The
AN/URR-58 is an hybrid receiver, it uses tubes and transistors. The
RF mixer is the one with the double triode tube, so a sort of mystery arises;
where or in which receiver the two FETs mixer has been used?
6-REFERENCES
1- SS-1R
– Instruction Manual – 1963
2-
SS-1R
– Instruction Manual – 1965
3- W.K. Squires, W2PUL - A New Approach to
Receiver Front-End Design - QST-September 1963
4- Squires-Sanders SS-1R Receiver - Recent
Equipment - QST May 1964
5- T. Hoitenga, K8NGV - Squires-Sanders (SS-1R,
SS-1V, SS-1S, SS-1RS)
- Electric Radio - July 1994
6- SS-1R - Field Alignment Procedure - October
1966
7- Squires-Sanders, Inc. - Overview of a company
of the past - www.radiopharos.it
8- SS-1R
- Test Procedure - September 1964
9- R.K. Jeffers, W2ALL - Cross modulation
and desensitization - Technical Correspondence
- QST - June 1964
10-R.
Moore, K1DBR - Designing Communications Receivers for Good Strong
Signal Performance -
Ham Radio - February 1973
11-William K. Squires - Mixer circuit employing linear resistive
elements -
Application
Serial N° 639,231 filed in 1967 – Patent N° 3,383,601 issued in 1968.
7- THE SHADOWS
So
far I have described this receiver highlighting its qualities and virtues, but
what about its
"shadows" or its defects?
A- The SS-1R was designed for an RF input
(antenna) impedance of 52 Ohms, like so many other receivers, but if used with
different or unknown antenna impedance (Long Wire, Whip, etc.) creates several
problems; reception of not in band signals, "deafness" in the actual band in
use, etc.
This is due to:
a- the absence of an RF amplifier stage that separates the mixer from the antenna and therefore presents always the same impedance at the input of the mixer.
b- the RF input filter, which being of particular conception, do not performs its function properly due to the impedance mismatch while having excellent characteristics of image frequency rejection when it is matched. Therefore it is imperative to use only antennas with 52 Ohms impedance or to match them with an antenna tuner (8). This seems, to me, not being a defect, but a requirement.
B- From the SS-1R/701 (or SS-1R) manual:
“Special Note: The SS-1R is a receiver of exceptional sensitivity,
signals as weak as 0.1 to 0.2 microvolts produce usable copy. At
the same time, exceptional image and spurious response rejection (greater
than 60dB) is provided. But this means that occasionally spurious signals not
in the actual band in use may be heard (they may not be heard on other receivers
even with poorer image rejection because the other receiver is not as “hot”),
for example, with a multi-band antenna, 20M signals might be heard weakly when
tuning 80M, since the 80M image lies on 20M. This in no way reduces the
receiver’s effectiveness, since the “not-in-band” signals are far below the
desired in-band-signals; it is simply the consequence of owning an unusually
“hot” receiver.”
This means that,
since the receiver is “so hot”, it could receive (though occasionally and in
particular conditions) signals "not in band" ???
A very unclear and discordant note for a receiver of such a class!
It is obvious that behind this note a receiver malfunction is hidden.
What could it be?
INQUIRY and ANALYSIS
Analyzing the
first 7360 (V1) single balanced switching mixer we note that the local
oscillator is injected in push-pull, through T6, to the deflection electrodes
and then the two 180° out of phase signals (and with the same frequency!)
that could arrive on the control grid single electrode, being in push-pull and
equal in amplitude, would be canceled at perfect DC and RF balance, hence the LO
rejection in the RF port (antenna) is very high. Then if we add
the step-down and filtering of the RF resonant circuit it becomes excellent,
could reach 100dB, therefore no spurious signals can be created at the mixer
input. Similarly the IF rejection is very good being the IF frequencies, 5--5.5
MHz, balanced in the T1 tuned transformer. This means that any signals in antenna with
the same frequencies of the variable IF (and not with any frequency as one might
think, not being T1 a broadband transformer) would be attenuated by >
60dB in the T1 secondary. But for other RF signals present in antenna, including
the desired one, they will appear at the output at the discretion of the RF and
IF (T1 + T2) filters selectivity! Not only that, they would also be amplified by
the tube itself! The same thing happens with the local oscillator signal which
we find it amplified in the T1 primary! To understand how this is possible we
must remember the operation of the 7360 mixer tube; the RF signal on the control
grid, filtered by the antenna filter, modulates the electrons ribbon beam
emerging from the cathode, this beam (or current) is alternately switched
between the two plates (and hence varying their current) depending on the
instantaneous LO RF voltage polarity impressed on each of the
deflectors electrodes. The switching rhythm is set by the frequency of the local
oscillator itself. This switching action is nothing but a mixing process that gives the difference
(and sum) between the LO and the RF, the result is the value of the IF. The instant when the beam is centered on
one or other of the two anodes the tube operates, as well, as a conventional
pentode amplifier. There is also amplification (lower) from the deflectors to the plates.
This is why we have the RF and LO signals amplified in the output. The T1 IF
transformer having the two LO signals in the primary, because present and
amplified on the plates, in anti-phase and with the same amplitude are canceled
in the center tap but, unfortunately, appear as a single frequency in the
secondary, and hence at the T2 output (and to the V2 grid) this frequency (as
per any other undesired RF signals) is attenuated only (but fortunately!) by the
filter selectivity and the capacitive attenuator C55/C58. It is obvious that all
these undesired signals may create extra spurious responses. The second mixer V2 do not contribute to create other
unwanted signals because they are stopped by the narrower filter selectivity
that follows T4. Where and how the extra spurious responses are generated?
These extra spurious signals arise in the T1 primary coil (and
consequently transferred in the secondary) where a mixing process takes
place (see
APPENDIX 1). The amplified anti-phase LO frequency
cyclically interrupted in the 7360 plates, and hence alternately switched
between the T1 primary ends, easily mixes with the amplified RF signal(s)
and with the IF frequency (already formed in the tube) that are in the primary
coil. All the combinations within these signals are possible! This is one of
the reasons why a relatively low LO level has been chosen to be injected in the
deflectors of the 7360s because a higher level would facilitate the undesired
mixing process and lead to higher spurious. The antenna filter that has, as
already outlined, excellent rejection at the image frequency, good selectivity,
at least more than enough for a mixer like the 7360 with a high immunity to
strong adjacent signals, but having a single tuned circuit has a low out of band
attenuation. Why a multiple cells RF filter has not been foreseen? Because a
filter of this type would have introduced a higher attenuation at the expense of
the sensitivity and perhaps it would not have achieved a very high attenuation
at the image frequency. Beyond any consideration the original RF filter remains
very valuable not only for its high image rejection but also for its low
insertion loss (and good voltage step-up) that permits to obtain a very good
sensitivity to the receiver. We can consider its combination with the 7360
mixer, guessed. However a solution had to be found to maximize the performance
of the 7360 although this anomaly occurs rarely and in certain situations. What
can be done to eliminate or mitigate it?
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
A very effective solution is to block the offending signals (in particular the
LO signal) at the mixer plates,
before they reach the T1 primary and therefore before any undesired
mixing action takes place. How this can be realized? It can be done by
inserting, in the V1 plates paths, low pass or notch filters, these must be
exactly identical in each plate so as not to degrade the balance (also
any extra added capacitance should be taken into account).
It should be sufficient to notch the 9MHz and 16MHz LO frequencies as these are
used to receive most of the bands.
This could be more than enough not to create
spurious responses being the LO signal the most insidious in that point.
This solution has not yet been performed. A sort of phase cancellation system of
the LO on the V1 plates
has been tried
but with no success. Any further solution and/or
test results will be published on this site.
APPENDIX 1
This is really a very interesting mixing process! Is this 7360 mixer anomaly
which inspired Squires for the development of his two other mixers (Ref. 10 and
11), since it is exactly their principle of operation?! However this principle
has inspired me, in the late eighties, when I was searching for the "Ideal RF
Mixer"(!) Among the various mixers investigated, I had built and tested an
inedited 7360 mixer, see
Fig.
A1-1. Considering the 7360 tube as a good pentode amplifier followed by a
very good switching mixer; if we "remove" the weak link, that is the amplifier,
and we leave the switching mixer, the latter can be fully exploited. This is
what has been done with this experimental unedited circuit. The tests results
were very encouraging but need further investigation, I hope to be able to
resume the tests in the near future (time permitting.......).
www.radiopharos.it
Copyright© 2010--2021 All rights
reserved
Tutti i diritti riservati
1st Issue - January 2010
Revision C: Last Update - March
2011
Revision D: Modified page background - May 2015